Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | — | 675B |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 1M | 256k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | — | $0.50 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | — | $1.50 |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | — | $0.50Mistral |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | — | $1.50Mistral |
| — | $175Mistral list price | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | — | 2% |
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 95.5% | — |
Terminal-Bench 2.1Agentic terminal coding — Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 88% | — |
Terminal-Bench 2.0Agentic terminal coding — Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | 88% | — |
BrowseCompWeb browsing — Can the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | 88% | — |
Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsMultidisciplinary reasoning — Humanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | 64.5% | — |
OSWorld-VerifiedAgentic computer use — Can the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Higher is better. | 85% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | Mistral |
| Release date | Jun 9 2026 | Dec 2 2025 |
| Access | Closed | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Claude Mythos 5vsGPT-6.1 SolMistral Large 3vsGPT-6.1 SolClaude Mythos 5vsGemini 4 ArgonMistral Large 3vsGemini 4 ArgonClaude Mythos 5vsMuse Spark OpenMistral Large 3vsMuse Spark OpenClaude Mythos 5vsGrok 4.7Mistral Large 3vsGrok 4.7Claude Mythos 5vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Mistral Large 3vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Claude Mythos 5vsKimi K3Mistral Large 3vsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
Claude Mythos 5 and Mistral Large 3 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Only Mistral Large 3 has a verified first-party API price: $0.50 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for Claude Mythos 5. Mistral Large 3 shipped 189 days before Claude Mythos 5, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 1M (Claude Mythos 5) vs 256k (Mistral Large 3). Claude Mythos 5 is closed, while Mistral Large 3 is open weight.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Claude Mythos 5 and Mistral Large 3 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.