Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | 816B | 675B |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 1M | 256k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | — | $0.50 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | — | $1.50 |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $1.25BaseTen | $0.50Mistral |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $4.25BaseTen | $1.50Mistral |
| $463Modal | $175Mistral list price | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | — | 2% |
DeepSWE 1.1Agentic coding — Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. (Version 1.1 of the test.) Higher is better. | 60% | — |
Terminal-Bench 2.1Agentic terminal coding — Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 76.4% | — |
MCP AtlasMulti-step tool use — Can the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | 89.2% | — |
JobBenchProfessional tool use — Tests the AI on professional workplace tasks that require using real work tools — the kind of multi-step jobs an office worker handles. Higher is better. | 61.8% | — |
GDPval-AA v2Knowledge work — economically valuable knowledge work (v2, re-based Elo) | 1401 | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | Mistral |
| Release date | Oct 15 2026 | Dec 2 2025 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Muse Spark OpenvsClaude Haiku 5.5Mistral Large 3vsClaude Haiku 5.5Muse Spark OpenvsGPT-6.1 SolMistral Large 3vsGPT-6.1 SolMuse Spark OpenvsGemini 4 ArgonMistral Large 3vsGemini 4 ArgonMuse Spark OpenvsGrok 4.7Mistral Large 3vsGrok 4.7Muse Spark OpenvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Mistral Large 3vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Muse Spark OpenvsKimi K3Mistral Large 3vsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
Muse Spark Open and Mistral Large 3 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Only Mistral Large 3 has a verified first-party API price: $0.50 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for Muse Spark Open. Mistral Large 3 shipped 317 days before Muse Spark Open, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Muse Spark Open has 816B parameters, while Mistral Large 3 has 675B. Context windows are 1M (Muse Spark Open) vs 256k (Mistral Large 3).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Muse Spark Open and Mistral Large 3 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.