Claude Mythos 5.1vsGPT-6 Sol
Claude Mythos 5.1 | GPT-6 Sol | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | 1M | 1.05M |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins · base tier | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | — | $2.00 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | — | $10.00 |
Cached input priceA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again. | — | $0.20 |
| BenchmarksPublished by one model only | ||
DeepSWE 1.1Agentic coding — Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. (Version 1.1 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 68.8% |
Terminal-Bench 4.0Agentic terminal coding — Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Version 4.0 recalibrated how much time, CPU and memory each task gets, removed eight tasks and fixed nineteen, so fewer runs fail for reasons that have nothing to do with the model. Scores are not comparable with earlier versions. Higher is better. | 60.9% | — |
OSWorld 2.0Agentic computer use — Can the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Version 2.0 is a harder, refreshed task set. Higher is better. | — | 60.5% |
Agent's Last Exam · pass@1Agentic computer use — A hard set of desktop and operating-system tasks an AI agent has to finish by looking at the screen and working the machine itself. The score is the share it passes outright — partial credit does not count. Higher is better. | — | 56.4% |
AutomationBenchBusiness workflows — Tests whether the AI can run real multi-step business workflows — the kind of end-to-end office processes companies want to automate — from start to finish. Higher is better. | — | 33.2% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Release date | Sep 1 2026 | Sep 22 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Other comparisons
Claude Mythos 5.1vsGemini 3.8 FlashGPT-6 SolvsGemini 3.8 FlashClaude Mythos 5.1vsMuse Spark 1.3GPT-6 SolvsMuse Spark 1.3Claude Mythos 5.1vsGrok 4.7GPT-6 SolvsGrok 4.7Claude Mythos 5.1vsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashGPT-6 SolvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashClaude Mythos 5.1vsMistral Medium 3.5GPT-6 SolvsMistral Medium 3.5Claude Mythos 5.1vsKimi K3GPT-6 SolvsKimi K3
Frequently asked questions
Claude Mythos 5.1 and GPT-6 Sol don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Only GPT-6 Sol has a verified first-party API price: $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for Claude Mythos 5.1. Claude Mythos 5.1 shipped 21 days before GPT-6 Sol, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 1M (Claude Mythos 5.1) vs 1.05M (GPT-6 Sol).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Claude Mythos 5.1 and GPT-6 Sol don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.