Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | 100k | 128k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | — | $1.10 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | — | $4.40 |
Cached input priceA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again. | — | $0.55 |
These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
HumanEvalFunction synthesis — 164 small Python problems: the AI is given a function's description and has to write the working function. This was the coding benchmark of the GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 era, before the field moved to fixing real bugs in real repositories. Higher is better. | 58.7% | — |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 60% |
GSM8KGrade-school math — Grade-school maths word problems that take a few steps of arithmetic to work through. It separated the models of 2022 and 2023 sharply, then saturated. One caveat on the historical numbers: OpenAI included part of the GSM8K training set in GPT-4's pre-training mix, so GPT-4's score is not a clean few-shot result. Higher is better. | 86.7% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Release date | Aug 9 2023 | Sep 12 2024 |
| Access | Closed | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Claude Instant 1.2vsGemini 4 Argono1-minivsGemini 4 ArgonClaude Instant 1.2vsMuse Spark 1.3o1-minivsMuse Spark 1.3Claude Instant 1.2vsGrok 4.7o1-minivsGrok 4.7Claude Instant 1.2vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flasho1-minivsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashClaude Instant 1.2vsMistral Large 4o1-minivsMistral Large 4Claude Instant 1.2vsKimi K3o1-minivsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
Claude Instant 1.2 and o1-mini don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Only o1-mini has a verified first-party API price: $1.10 per million input tokens and $4.40 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for Claude Instant 1.2. Claude Instant 1.2 shipped 400 days before o1-mini, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 100k (Claude Instant 1.2) vs 128k (o1-mini).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Claude Instant 1.2 and o1-mini don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.