Claude Instant 1.2vsGPT-6 Sol
Claude Instant 1.2 | GPT-6 Sol | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | 100k | 1.05M |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins · base tier | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | — | $2.00 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | — | $10.00 |
Cached input priceA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again. | — | $0.20 |
| BenchmarksPublished by one model only | ||
DeepSWE 1.1Agentic coding — Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. (Version 1.1 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 68.8% |
HumanEvalFunction synthesis — 164 small Python problems: the AI is given a function's description and has to write the working function. This was the coding benchmark of the GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 era, before the field moved to fixing real bugs in real repositories. Higher is better. | 58.7% | — |
GSM8KGrade-school math — Grade-school maths word problems that take a few steps of arithmetic to work through. It separated the models of 2022 and 2023 sharply, then saturated. One caveat on the historical numbers: OpenAI included part of the GSM8K training set in GPT-4's pre-training mix, so GPT-4's score is not a clean few-shot result. Higher is better. | 86.7% | — |
OSWorld 2.0Agentic computer use — Can the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Version 2.0 is a harder, refreshed task set. Higher is better. | — | 60.5% |
Agent's Last Exam · pass@1Agentic computer use — A hard set of desktop and operating-system tasks an AI agent has to finish by looking at the screen and working the machine itself. The score is the share it passes outright — partial credit does not count. Higher is better. | — | 56.4% |
AutomationBenchBusiness workflows — Tests whether the AI can run real multi-step business workflows — the kind of end-to-end office processes companies want to automate — from start to finish. Higher is better. | — | 33.2% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Release date | Aug 9 2023 | Sep 22 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Other comparisons
Claude Instant 1.2vsGemini 3.8 FlashGPT-6 SolvsGemini 3.8 FlashClaude Instant 1.2vsMuse Spark 1.3GPT-6 SolvsMuse Spark 1.3Claude Instant 1.2vsGrok 4.7GPT-6 SolvsGrok 4.7Claude Instant 1.2vsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashGPT-6 SolvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashClaude Instant 1.2vsMistral Medium 3.5GPT-6 SolvsMistral Medium 3.5Claude Instant 1.2vsKimi K3GPT-6 SolvsKimi K3
Frequently asked questions
Claude Instant 1.2 and GPT-6 Sol don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Only GPT-6 Sol has a verified first-party API price: $2.00 per million input tokens and $10.00 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for Claude Instant 1.2. Claude Instant 1.2 shipped 1140 days before GPT-6 Sol, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 100k (Claude Instant 1.2) vs 1.05M (GPT-6 Sol).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Claude Instant 1.2 and GPT-6 Sol don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.