Claude 3.5 Sonnetvso1-preview
Claude 3.5 Sonnet | o1-preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Context window | — | 128k |
| Benchmarks | ||
Nonsense detection BullshitBench v2Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 45% | — |
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 33.4% | — |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 59.4% | 73.3%Best |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Release date | Jun 20 2024 | Sep 12 2024 |
| Access | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Which is better: Claude 3.5 Sonnet or o1-preview?
o1-preview leads Claude 3.5 Sonnet on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (GPQA Diamond). Claude 3.5 Sonnet shipped 84 days before o1-preview, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On GPQA Diamond, o1-preview leads at 73.3% vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet at 59.4%.
Frequently asked questions
Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released by Anthropic on Jun 20 2024.
o1-preview was released by OpenAI on Sep 12 2024.
o1-preview leads on GPQA Diamond — Claude 3.5 Sonnet 59.4% vs o1-preview 73.3%.
Other comparisons
Claude 3.5 SonnetvsGemini 3.6 Flasho1-previewvsGemini 3.6 FlashClaude 3.5 SonnetvsMuse Spark 1.2o1-previewvsMuse Spark 1.2Claude 3.5 SonnetvsGrok 4.5o1-previewvsGrok 4.5Claude 3.5 SonnetvsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731o1-previewvsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Claude 3.5 SonnetvsMistral Medium 3.5o1-previewvsMistral Medium 3.5Claude 3.5 SonnetvsKimi K3o1-previewvsKimi K3