Compare AI models
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | — | $0.30 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | — | $2.50 |
Cached input priceA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again. | — | $0.03 |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | — | $0.15Google AI Studio |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | — | $1.25Google AI Studio |
| — | $185Google list price | |
| Benchmarks | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 46% | 19% |
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 33.4% | — |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 59.4% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | |
| Release date | Jun 20 2024 | Apr 17 2025 |
| Access | Closed | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Claude 3.5 SonnetvsGPT-6.1 SolGemini 2.5 FlashvsGPT-6.1 SolClaude 3.5 SonnetvsMuse WonderGemini 2.5 FlashvsMuse WonderClaude 3.5 SonnetvsGrok 4.7Gemini 2.5 FlashvsGrok 4.7Claude 3.5 SonnetvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashGemini 2.5 FlashvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashClaude 3.5 SonnetvsMistral Large 4Gemini 2.5 FlashvsMistral Large 4Claude 3.5 SonnetvsKimi K3Gemini 2.5 FlashvsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads Gemini 2.5 Flash on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (BullshitBench v2). Only Gemini 2.5 Flash has a verified first-party API price: $0.30 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for Claude 3.5 Sonnet. Claude 3.5 Sonnet shipped 301 days before Gemini 2.5 Flash, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On BullshitBench v2, Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads at 46% vs Gemini 2.5 Flash at 19%.