Claude 3 Sonnetvso1
Claude 3 Sonnet | o1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | — | 200k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | — | $15.00 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | — | $60.00 |
Cached input priceA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again. | — | $7.50 |
| Benchmarks | ||
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 40.4% | 75.7% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | OpenAI |
| Release date | Mar 4 2024 | Dec 5 2024 |
| Access | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Other comparisons
Frequently asked questions
o1 leads Claude 3 Sonnet on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (GPQA Diamond). Only o1 has a verified first-party API price: $15.00 per million input tokens and $60.00 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for Claude 3 Sonnet. Claude 3 Sonnet shipped 276 days before o1, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On GPQA Diamond, o1 leads at 75.7% vs Claude 3 Sonnet at 40.4%.