Claude 3 OpusvsNemotron Nano 2
Claude 3 Opus | Nemotron Nano 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | — | 9B |
| Benchmarks | ||
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 50.4% | 64% |
| BenchmarksPublished by one model only | ||
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 33% | — |
LiveCodeBenchCompetitive coding — Coding problems published so recently the AI can't have seen them in training — a contamination-free test of raw programming skill. Higher is better. | — | 71.1% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | NVIDIA |
| Release date | Mar 4 2024 | Aug 18 2025 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
Other comparisons
Claude 3 OpusvsGPT-6 AstraNemotron Nano 2vsGPT-6 AstraClaude 3 OpusvsGemini 3.8 FlashNemotron Nano 2vsGemini 3.8 FlashClaude 3 OpusvsMuse Spark 1.3Nemotron Nano 2vsMuse Spark 1.3Claude 3 OpusvsGrok 4.6Nemotron Nano 2vsGrok 4.6Claude 3 OpusvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashNemotron Nano 2vsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashClaude 3 OpusvsMistral Medium 3.5Nemotron Nano 2vsMistral Medium 3.5
Frequently asked questions
Nemotron Nano 2 leads Claude 3 Opus on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (GPQA Diamond). Claude 3 Opus shipped 532 days before Nemotron Nano 2, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Claude 3 Opus is proprietary, while Nemotron Nano 2 is open weight.
On GPQA Diamond, Nemotron Nano 2 leads at 64% vs Claude 3 Opus at 50.4%.