Compare AI models
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | — | $0.042Darkbloom |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | — | $0.22Darkbloom |
| Benchmarks | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 10% | 25% |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 33.3% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | |
| Release date | Mar 4 2024 | Apr 2 2026 |
| Access | Closed | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Claude 3 HaikuvsGPT-6.1 SolGemma 4vsGPT-6.1 SolClaude 3 HaikuvsMuse Spark 1.3Gemma 4vsMuse Spark 1.3Claude 3 HaikuvsGrok 4.7Gemma 4vsGrok 4.7Claude 3 HaikuvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashGemma 4vsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashClaude 3 HaikuvsMistral Large 4Gemma 4vsMistral Large 4Claude 3 HaikuvsKimi K3Gemma 4vsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
Gemma 4 leads Claude 3 Haiku on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (BullshitBench v2). Claude 3 Haiku shipped 759 days before Gemma 4, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Claude 3 Haiku is closed, while Gemma 4 is open weight.
On BullshitBench v2, Gemma 4 leads at 25% vs Claude 3 Haiku at 10%.