Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | — | 12B |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | 200k | 128k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | — | $0.018DekaLLM |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | — | $0.027Io Net |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Anthropic | Mistral |
| Release date | Nov 21 2023 | Jul 18 2024 |
| Access | Closed | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Claude 2.1vsGPT-6.1 SolMistral NeMovsGPT-6.1 SolClaude 2.1vsGemini 4 ArgonMistral NeMovsGemini 4 ArgonClaude 2.1vsMuse Spark 1.3Mistral NeMovsMuse Spark 1.3Claude 2.1vsGrok 4.7Mistral NeMovsGrok 4.7Claude 2.1vsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashMistral NeMovsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashClaude 2.1vsKimi K3Mistral NeMovsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
Claude 2.1 and Mistral NeMo don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Claude 2.1 shipped 240 days before Mistral NeMo, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 200k (Claude 2.1) vs 128k (Mistral NeMo). Claude 2.1 is closed, while Mistral NeMo is open weight.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Claude 2.1 and Mistral NeMo don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.