Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | — | 9B |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 128k | 128k |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
LiveCodeBenchCompetitive coding — Coding problems published so recently the AI can't have seen them in training — a contamination-free test of raw programming skill. Higher is better. | 74.8% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | SpaceXSI | Z.ai |
| Release date | Feb 17 2025 | Jun 5 2024 |
| Access | Closed | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Grok 3 minivsClaude Haiku 5.5GLM-4-9BvsClaude Haiku 5.5Grok 3 minivsGPT-6.1 SolGLM-4-9BvsGPT-6.1 SolGrok 3 minivsGemini 4 ArgonGLM-4-9BvsGemini 4 ArgonGrok 3 minivsMuse Spark OpenGLM-4-9BvsMuse Spark OpenGrok 3 minivsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017GLM-4-9BvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Grok 3 minivsMistral Large 4GLM-4-9BvsMistral Large 4Frequently asked questions
Grok 3 mini and GLM-4-9B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. GLM-4-9B shipped 257 days before Grok 3 mini, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 128k (Grok 3 mini) vs 128k (GLM-4-9B). Grok 3 mini is closed, while GLM-4-9B is open weight.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Grok 3 mini and GLM-4-9B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.