Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | 0.6B/1.7B/4B/8B/14B/30B/32B/235B | 9B |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | — | 128k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.08DeepInfra | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $0.22NextBit | — |
| $30.00DeepInfra · fp8 | — | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 6% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Qwen | Z.ai |
| Release date | Apr 29 2025 | Jun 5 2024 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Qwen3vsClaude Haiku 5.5GLM-4-9BvsClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen3vsGPT-6.1 TerraGLM-4-9BvsGPT-6.1 TerraQwen3vsGemini 4 CarbonGLM-4-9BvsGemini 4 CarbonQwen3vsMuse Spark OpenGLM-4-9BvsMuse Spark OpenQwen3vsGrok 4.7GLM-4-9BvsGrok 4.7Qwen3vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017GLM-4-9BvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Frequently asked questions
Qwen3 and GLM-4-9B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. GLM-4-9B shipped 328 days before Qwen3, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Qwen3 has 0.6B/1.7B/4B/8B/14B/30B/32B/235B parameters, while GLM-4-9B has 9B.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Qwen3 and GLM-4-9B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.