Qwen3vsGLM-4-9B
Qwen3 | GLM-4-9B | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | 235B | 9B |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | 128k | — |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins · base tier | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | $0.70 | — |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | $2.80 | — |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.0482StreamLake | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $0.1931StreamLake | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Qwen | Z.ai |
| Release date | Apr 29 2025 | Jun 5 2024 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
Other comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Qwen3 and GLM-4-9B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Only Qwen3 has a verified first-party API price: $0.70 per million input tokens and $2.80 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for GLM-4-9B. GLM-4-9B shipped 328 days before Qwen3, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Qwen3 has 235B parameters, while GLM-4-9B has 9B.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Qwen3 and GLM-4-9B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.