Qwen3.8-MaxvsGrok 4.20 Beta
Qwen3.8-Max | Grok 4.20 Beta | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | 2.4T | — |
Context window | 1M | — |
| Benchmarks | ||
Nonsense detection BullshitBench v2Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | — | 56% |
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | 67.7% | — |
Research reproduction PaperBenchreproducing the results of an ML research paper end to end | 93% | — |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 86.6% | — |
Professional tool use JobBenchTests the AI on professional workplace tasks that require using real work tools — the kind of multi-step jobs an office worker handles. Higher is better. | 53.4% | — |
Abstract reasoning ARC-AGI-2Puzzle-style tests of abstract reasoning and pattern-finding — the kind of thing people find easy but AIs often struggle with. Higher is better. | — | 53.3% |
Agentic computer use OSWorld-VerifiedCan the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Higher is better. | 86.1% | — |
Chart reasoning CharXiv ReasoningCan the AI read and reason about complex charts and figures, not just text? Higher is better. | 88.4% | — |
Visual reasoning BabyVisionTests core visual reasoning — seeing and understanding images the way even young children can, which AIs often find surprisingly hard. Higher is better. | 82% | — |
Community preference Arena Elo (Text)Real people chat with two anonymous AIs side by side and vote for the answer they prefer. Votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai — it measures which AI people actually like, not test scores. Higher is better. | 1497Best | 1475 |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | 1667 | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Qwen | SpaceXAI |
| Release date | Aug 3 2026 | Feb 17 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Which is better: Qwen3.8-Max or Grok 4.20 Beta?
Qwen3.8-Max leads Grok 4.20 Beta on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (Arena Elo (Text)). Grok 4.20 Beta shipped 167 days before Qwen3.8-Max, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On Arena Elo (Text), Qwen3.8-Max leads at 1497 vs Grok 4.20 Beta at 1475.
Frequently asked questions
Qwen3.8-Max was released by Qwen on Aug 3 2026.
Grok 4.20 Beta was released by SpaceXAI on Feb 17 2026.
Other comparisons
Qwen3.8-MaxvsClaude Opus 5Grok 4.20 BetavsClaude Opus 5Qwen3.8-MaxvsGPT-5.6 SolGrok 4.20 BetavsGPT-5.6 SolQwen3.8-MaxvsGemini 3.6 FlashGrok 4.20 BetavsGemini 3.6 FlashQwen3.8-MaxvsMuse Spark 1.2Grok 4.20 BetavsMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.8-MaxvsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Grok 4.20 BetavsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Qwen3.8-MaxvsMistral Medium 3.5Grok 4.20 BetavsMistral Medium 3.5