Qwen3.8-27BvsGLM-4.6

Qwen3.8-27B
GLM-4.6
Specifications
Parameters
27B
355B
Context window
262k
200k
Benchmarks
Agentic coding
SWE-Bench Pro
61.7%
Coding
SWE-Bench Verified
68%
Agentic coding
DeepSWE 1.1
42.2%
Repo-level code generation
NL2Repo-Bench
42.3%
Software engineering
QwenSWEBench
79%
Competitive coding
LiveCodeBench
90.3%
Agentic terminal coding
Terminal-Bench 2.1
73%
Professional tool use
JobBench
33.4%
Long-horizon office work
CoWorkBench
70.7%
Multidisciplinary reasoning
Humanity's Last Exam · no tools
30.8%
Science
GPQA Diamond
89.2%
Instruction following
IFBench
79.5%
Agentic computer use
Agent's Last Exam · pass@1
20.4%
Agentic computer use
Agent's Last Exam · score
42.9%
Community preference (code)
Arena Elo (Code)
1339
Overview
CompanyQwenZ.ai
Release dateAug 14 2026Sep 30 2025
AccessOpen WeightOpen Weight

Which is better: Qwen3.8-27B or GLM-4.6?

Qwen3.8-27B and GLM-4.6 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. GLM-4.6 shipped 318 days before Qwen3.8-27B, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.

Qwen3.8-27B has 27B parameters, while GLM-4.6 has 355B. Context windows are 262k (Qwen3.8-27B) vs 200k (GLM-4.6).

Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Qwen3.8-27B and GLM-4.6 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.

Frequently asked questions

Qwen3.8-27B was released by Qwen on Aug 14 2026.

GLM-4.6 was released by Z.ai on Sep 30 2025.

Qwen3.8-27B has a 262k context window; GLM-4.6 has 200k.

Other comparisons