Qwen3-Coder-NextvsGrok 4.6
Qwen3-Coder-Next | Grok 4.6 | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | 80B | — |
Context window | 256k | — |
| Benchmarks | ||
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | 44.3% | — |
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 70.6% | — |
Multilingual coding SWE-Bench MultilingualLike SWE-Bench, but the coding problems span many programming languages, not just one. Tests how broadly the AI can code. Higher is better. | 62.8% | — |
Agentic coding CursorBench v3.2Cursor's own test of harder, real-world coding tasks inside a code editor, on the refreshed v3.2 task set. Scores aren't comparable with v3.1. Higher is better. | — | 69.9% |
Agentic coding DeepSWE 1.1Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. (Version 1.1 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 65.9% |
Agentic coding FrontierCode v1.1 (Extended) · extended splitfrontier-difficulty agentic coding tasks (v1.1, extended split) | — | 61.3% |
Expert software engineering APEX-SWEexpert-level software-engineering tasks (AI Productivity Index) | — | 56.4% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 3.0command-line task completion (v3.0, much harder task set) | — | 26% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.0Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | 36.2% | — |
Expert agentic work APEX-Agentsexpert-level agentic work tasks (AI Productivity Index) | — | 57.5% |
Agentic legal work Harvey's Legal Agent BenchmarkHarvey's test of whether an AI agent can complete real legal work — drafting and reviewing documents, working with spreadsheets and presentations, and navigating files the way a lawyer's assistant would. Higher is better. | — | 15.8% |
Overall intelligence AA Intelligence IndexArtificial Analysis composite intelligence index across evals | — | 61 |
Knowledge work GDPval-AA v2economically valuable knowledge work (v2, re-based Elo) | — | 1753 |
Knowledge work AA-BriefcaseArtificial Analysis agentic office-work eval (Elo) | — | 1577 |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Qwen | SpaceXAI |
| Release date | Feb 3 2026 | Aug 12 2026 |
| Access | Open Weight | Proprietary |
Which is better: Qwen3-Coder-Next or Grok 4.6?
Qwen3-Coder-Next and Grok 4.6 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Qwen3-Coder-Next shipped 190 days before Grok 4.6, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Qwen3-Coder-Next is open weight, while Grok 4.6 is proprietary.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Qwen3-Coder-Next and Grok 4.6 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.
Frequently asked questions
Qwen3-Coder-Next was released by Qwen on Feb 3 2026.
Grok 4.6 was released by SpaceXAI on Aug 12 2026.
Qwen3-Coder-Next is an open weight model released by Qwen. Grok 4.6 is a proprietary model released by SpaceXAI.
Other comparisons
Qwen3-Coder-NextvsClaude Opus 5Grok 4.6vsClaude Opus 5Qwen3-Coder-NextvsGPT-5.6-CyberGrok 4.6vsGPT-5.6-CyberQwen3-Coder-NextvsGemini 3.7 FlashGrok 4.6vsGemini 3.7 FlashQwen3-Coder-NextvsMuse GlimmerGrok 4.6vsMuse GlimmerQwen3-Coder-NextvsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Grok 4.6vsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Qwen3-Coder-NextvsMistral Medium 3.5Grok 4.6vsMistral Medium 3.5