Muse GlimmervsQwen3-Coder-Next
Muse Glimmer | Qwen3-Coder-Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | 30B | 80B |
Context window | — | 256k |
| Benchmarks | ||
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | 51.2%Best | 44.3% |
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 76%Best | 70.6% |
Multilingual coding SWE-Bench MultilingualLike SWE-Bench, but the coding problems span many programming languages, not just one. Tests how broadly the AI can code. Higher is better. | — | 62.8% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 51.7% | — |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.0Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 36.2% |
Multi-step tool use MCP AtlasCan the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | 75.5% | — |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · no toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects, written so you can't just look up the answer. “No tools” means the AI answers on its own. Higher is better. | 22% | — |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 83.5% | — |
Agentic computer use OSWorld-VerifiedCan the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Higher is better. | 65.9% | — |
Knowledge work GDPval-AA v2economically valuable knowledge work (v2, re-based Elo) | 953 | — |
Chart reasoning CharXiv ReasoningCan the AI read and reason about complex charts and figures, not just text? Higher is better. | 78.8% | — |
Multimodal reasoning MMMU-ProA tougher version of MMMU — college-level questions that mix images, diagrams, and text together. Higher is better. | 74% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | Qwen |
| Release date | Aug 10 2026 | Feb 3 2026 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
Which is better: Muse Glimmer or Qwen3-Coder-Next?
Muse Glimmer leads Qwen3-Coder-Next on 2 of the 2 benchmarks they both report (SWE-Bench Pro, SWE-Bench Verified). Qwen3-Coder-Next shipped 188 days before Muse Glimmer, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Muse Glimmer has 30B parameters, while Qwen3-Coder-Next has 80B.
On SWE-Bench Pro, Muse Glimmer leads at 51.2% vs Qwen3-Coder-Next at 44.3%. On SWE-Bench Verified, Muse Glimmer leads at 76% vs Qwen3-Coder-Next at 70.6%.
Frequently asked questions
Muse Glimmer was released by Meta on Aug 10 2026.
Qwen3-Coder-Next was released by Qwen on Feb 3 2026.
Muse Glimmer leads on SWE-Bench Pro — Muse Glimmer 51.2% vs Qwen3-Coder-Next 44.3%.
Other comparisons
Muse GlimmervsClaude Opus 5Qwen3-Coder-NextvsClaude Opus 5Muse GlimmervsGPT-5.6 SolQwen3-Coder-NextvsGPT-5.6 SolMuse GlimmervsGemini 3.6 FlashQwen3-Coder-NextvsGemini 3.6 FlashMuse GlimmervsGrok 4.5Qwen3-Coder-NextvsGrok 4.5Muse GlimmervsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Qwen3-Coder-NextvsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Muse GlimmervsMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3-Coder-NextvsMistral Medium 3.5