Qwen2.5-CodervsGLM-4-9B
Qwen2.5-Coder | GLM-4-9B | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | 32B | 9B |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | 128k | — |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.66Cloudflare | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $1.00Cloudflare | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Qwen | Z.ai |
| Release date | Nov 12 2024 | Jun 5 2024 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
Other comparisons
Qwen2.5-CodervsClaude Fable 5.1GLM-4-9BvsClaude Fable 5.1Qwen2.5-CodervsGPT-6 AstraGLM-4-9BvsGPT-6 AstraQwen2.5-CodervsGemini 3.8 FlashGLM-4-9BvsGemini 3.8 FlashQwen2.5-CodervsMuse Spark 1.3GLM-4-9BvsMuse Spark 1.3Qwen2.5-CodervsGrok 4.6GLM-4-9BvsGrok 4.6Qwen2.5-CodervsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashGLM-4-9BvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Frequently asked questions
Qwen2.5-Coder and GLM-4-9B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. GLM-4-9B shipped 160 days before Qwen2.5-Coder, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Qwen2.5-Coder has 32B parameters, while GLM-4-9B has 9B.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Qwen2.5-Coder and GLM-4-9B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.