o1vsQwen3.7-Max
o1 | Qwen3.7-Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Context window | 200k | — |
| Benchmarks | ||
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | — | 60.6% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.0Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 69.7% |
Multi-step tool use MCP AtlasCan the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | — | 76.4% |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 75.7% | 92.4%Best |
| Overview | ||
| Company | OpenAI | Qwen |
| Release date | Dec 5 2024 | May 20 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Which is better: o1 or Qwen3.7-Max?
Qwen3.7-Max leads o1 on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (GPQA Diamond). o1 shipped 531 days before Qwen3.7-Max, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On GPQA Diamond, Qwen3.7-Max leads at 92.4% vs o1 at 75.7%.
Frequently asked questions
o1 was released by OpenAI on Dec 5 2024.
Qwen3.7-Max was released by Qwen on May 20 2026.
Qwen3.7-Max leads on GPQA Diamond — o1 75.7% vs Qwen3.7-Max 92.4%.