o1-previewvsQwen3.7-Max
o1-preview | Qwen3.7-Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Context window | 128k | — |
| Benchmarks | ||
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | — | 60.6% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.0Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 69.7% |
Multi-step tool use MCP AtlasCan the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | — | 76.4% |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 73.3% | 92.4%Best |
| Overview | ||
| Company | OpenAI | Qwen |
| Release date | Sep 12 2024 | May 20 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Which is better: o1-preview or Qwen3.7-Max?
Qwen3.7-Max leads o1-preview on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (GPQA Diamond). o1-preview shipped 615 days before Qwen3.7-Max, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On GPQA Diamond, Qwen3.7-Max leads at 92.4% vs o1-preview at 73.3%.
Frequently asked questions
o1-preview was released by OpenAI on Sep 12 2024.
Qwen3.7-Max was released by Qwen on May 20 2026.
Qwen3.7-Max leads on GPQA Diamond — o1-preview 73.3% vs Qwen3.7-Max 92.4%.
Other comparisons
o1-previewvsClaude Opus 5Qwen3.7-MaxvsClaude Opus 5o1-previewvsGemini 3.6 FlashQwen3.7-MaxvsGemini 3.6 Flasho1-previewvsMuse Spark 1.1Qwen3.7-MaxvsMuse Spark 1.1o1-previewvsGrok 4.5Qwen3.7-MaxvsGrok 4.5o1-previewvsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Qwen3.7-MaxvsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731o1-previewvsMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.7-MaxvsMistral Medium 3.5