GPT-5.4 minivsQwen3.7-Max
GPT-5.4 mini | Qwen3.7-Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Context window | 400k | — |
| Benchmarks | ||
Nonsense detection BullshitBench v2Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 32% | 71%Best |
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | — | 60.6% |
Supabase coding Supabase Evals · with skillsSupabase's own open benchmark: a coding agent is dropped into a real Supabase project and asked to do real work — set up a schema, fix a broken security policy, debug an Edge Function — and every run is checked against a live Supabase stack. This is the headline number, where the agent has Supabase's own skills loaded, as most people building on Supabase would. The score is the share of scenarios it got right. Higher is better. | 78.9% | — |
Supabase coding Supabase Evals · no skillsThe same Supabase scenarios, but with none of Supabase's skills loaded — so it measures what the model already knows about building on Supabase, rather than how well it follows Supabase's supplied instructions. Higher is better. | 73.7% | — |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.0Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 69.7% |
Multi-step tool use MCP AtlasCan the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | — | 76.4% |
Browser agent BU BenchCan the AI drive a real web browser to finish tasks — clicking, filling forms, and navigating sites the way a person would? Run by Browser Use on their BU Bench task set. Higher is better. | 36% | — |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 92.4% |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | 1398 | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | OpenAI | Qwen |
| Release date | Mar 17 2026 | May 20 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Which is better: GPT-5.4 mini or Qwen3.7-Max?
Qwen3.7-Max leads GPT-5.4 mini on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (BullshitBench v2). GPT-5.4 mini shipped 64 days before Qwen3.7-Max, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On BullshitBench v2, Qwen3.7-Max leads at 71% vs GPT-5.4 mini at 32%.
Frequently asked questions
GPT-5.4 mini was released by OpenAI on Mar 17 2026.
Qwen3.7-Max was released by Qwen on May 20 2026.
Other comparisons
GPT-5.4 minivsClaude Opus 5Qwen3.7-MaxvsClaude Opus 5GPT-5.4 minivsGemini 3.6 FlashQwen3.7-MaxvsGemini 3.6 FlashGPT-5.4 minivsMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.7-MaxvsMuse Spark 1.2GPT-5.4 minivsGrok 4.5Qwen3.7-MaxvsGrok 4.5GPT-5.4 minivsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Qwen3.7-MaxvsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731GPT-5.4 minivsMistral Medium 3.5Qwen3.7-MaxvsMistral Medium 3.5