GPT-5.3-Codex-SparkvsQwen3-Coder-Next

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark
Qwen3-Coder-Next
Specifications
Parameters
80B
Context window
128k
256k
Benchmarks
Agentic coding
SWE-Bench Pro
44.3%
Coding
SWE-Bench Verified
70.6%
Multilingual coding
SWE-Bench Multilingual
62.8%
Agentic terminal coding
Terminal-Bench 2.0
36.2%
Overview
CompanyOpenAIQwen
Release dateFeb 12 2026Feb 3 2026
AccessProprietaryOpen Weight

Which is better: GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark or Qwen3-Coder-Next?

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark and Qwen3-Coder-Next don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Qwen3-Coder-Next shipped 9 days before GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.

Context windows are 128k (GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark) vs 256k (Qwen3-Coder-Next). GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark is proprietary, while Qwen3-Coder-Next is open weight.

Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark and Qwen3-Coder-Next don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.

Frequently asked questions

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark was released by OpenAI on Feb 12 2026.

Qwen3-Coder-Next was released by Qwen on Feb 3 2026.

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark has a 128k context window; Qwen3-Coder-Next has 256k.

GPT-5.3-Codex-Spark is a proprietary model released by OpenAI. Qwen3-Coder-Next is an open weight model released by Qwen.

Other comparisons