Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | 74B | 9B |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
Terminal-Bench 2.1Agentic terminal coding — Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 50.98% | — |
MCP AtlasMulti-step tool use — Can the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | 52.2% | — |
BrowseCompWeb browsing — Can the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | 66.75% | — |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 86.43% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | NVIDIA | Z.ai |
| Release date | Oct 15 2026 | Jun 5 2024 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74BvsClaude Haiku 5.5GLM-4-9BvsClaude Haiku 5.5Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74BvsGPT-6.1 SolGLM-4-9BvsGPT-6.1 SolNemotron 3.5 Bolt 74BvsGemini 4 ArgonGLM-4-9BvsGemini 4 ArgonNemotron 3.5 Bolt 74BvsMuse Spark OpenGLM-4-9BvsMuse Spark OpenNemotron 3.5 Bolt 74BvsGrok 4.7GLM-4-9BvsGrok 4.7Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74BvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashGLM-4-9BvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashFrequently asked questions
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B and GLM-4-9B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. GLM-4-9B shipped 862 days before Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B has 74B parameters, while GLM-4-9B has 9B.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B and GLM-4-9B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.