Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | 2.8T | 0.5B/1.5B/3B/7B/14B/32B |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 1M | — |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | — | $0.66Cloudflare |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | — | $1.00Cloudflare |
| — | $182Cloudflare | |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Moonshot AI | Qwen |
| Release date | Oct 23 2026 | Nov 12 2024 |
| Access | Closed | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Kimi K3.1 Pro HighspeedvsClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen2.5-CodervsClaude Haiku 5.5Kimi K3.1 Pro HighspeedvsGPT-6.1 SolQwen2.5-CodervsGPT-6.1 SolKimi K3.1 Pro HighspeedvsGemini 4 ArgonQwen2.5-CodervsGemini 4 ArgonKimi K3.1 Pro HighspeedvsMuse Spark OpenQwen2.5-CodervsMuse Spark OpenKimi K3.1 Pro HighspeedvsGrok 4.7Qwen2.5-CodervsGrok 4.7Kimi K3.1 Pro HighspeedvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Qwen2.5-CodervsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Frequently asked questions
Kimi K3.1 Pro Highspeed and Qwen2.5-Coder don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Qwen2.5-Coder shipped 710 days before Kimi K3.1 Pro Highspeed, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Kimi K3.1 Pro Highspeed has 2.8T parameters, while Qwen2.5-Coder has 0.5B/1.5B/3B/7B/14B/32B. Kimi K3.1 Pro Highspeed is closed, while Qwen2.5-Coder is open weight.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Kimi K3.1 Pro Highspeed and Qwen2.5-Coder don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.