Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | 816B | — |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 1M | — |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $1.25BaseTen | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $4.25BaseTen | — |
| $463Modal | — | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
DeepSWE 1.1Agentic coding — Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. (Version 1.1 of the test.) Higher is better. | 60% | — |
Terminal-Bench 2.1Agentic terminal coding — Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 76.4% | — |
MCP AtlasMulti-step tool use — Can the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | 89.2% | — |
JobBenchProfessional tool use — Tests the AI on professional workplace tasks that require using real work tools — the kind of multi-step jobs an office worker handles. Higher is better. | 61.8% | — |
GDPval-AA v2Knowledge work — economically valuable knowledge work (v2, re-based Elo) | 1401 | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | Moonshot AI |
| Release date | Oct 15 2026 | Oct 23 2026 |
| Access | Open Weight | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Muse Spark OpenvsClaude Haiku 5.5Kimi K3.1 Pro HighspeedvsClaude Haiku 5.5Muse Spark OpenvsGPT-6.1 SolKimi K3.1 Pro HighspeedvsGPT-6.1 SolMuse Spark OpenvsGemini 4 ArgonKimi K3.1 Pro HighspeedvsGemini 4 ArgonMuse Spark OpenvsGrok 4.7Kimi K3.1 Pro HighspeedvsGrok 4.7Muse Spark OpenvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Kimi K3.1 Pro HighspeedvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Muse Spark OpenvsMistral Large 4Kimi K3.1 Pro HighspeedvsMistral Large 4Frequently asked questions
Muse Spark Open and Kimi K3.1 Pro Highspeed don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Muse Spark Open shipped 8 days before Kimi K3.1 Pro Highspeed, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Muse Spark Open is open weight, while Kimi K3.1 Pro Highspeed is closed.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Muse Spark Open and Kimi K3.1 Pro Highspeed don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.