Kimi K2.7 CodevsGPT-4o mini
Kimi K2.7 Code | GPT-4o mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | 1T | — |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | 256k | 128k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | $0.95 | $0.15 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | $4.00 | $0.60 |
Cached input priceA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again. | $0.19 | $0.075 |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.68DeepInfra | $0.15Azure |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $3.00StreamLake | $0.60Azure |
| BenchmarksPublished by one model only | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | — | 2% |
DeepSWE 1.1Agentic coding — Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. (Version 1.1 of the test.) Higher is better. | 31% | — |
Next.js EvalsNext.js coding — Vercel's open eval of how well AI coding agents build and migrate real Next.js apps — measured as the share of tasks the agent completes successfully. Higher is better. | 74% | — |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 40.2% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Moonshot AI | OpenAI |
| Release date | Jun 12 2026 | Jul 18 2024 |
| Access | Open Weight | Proprietary |
Other comparisons
Kimi K2.7 CodevsClaude Fable 5.1GPT-4o minivsClaude Fable 5.1Kimi K2.7 CodevsGemini 3.8 FlashGPT-4o minivsGemini 3.8 FlashKimi K2.7 CodevsMuse Spark 1.3GPT-4o minivsMuse Spark 1.3Kimi K2.7 CodevsGrok 4.6GPT-4o minivsGrok 4.6Kimi K2.7 CodevsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashGPT-4o minivsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashKimi K2.7 CodevsMistral Medium 3.5GPT-4o minivsMistral Medium 3.5
Frequently asked questions
Kimi K2.7 Code and GPT-4o mini don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. GPT-4o mini is cheaper on both input and output: $0.15 vs $0.95 per million input tokens, and $0.60 vs $4.00 per million output tokens. GPT-4o mini shipped 694 days before Kimi K2.7 Code, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 256k (Kimi K2.7 Code) vs 128k (GPT-4o mini). Kimi K2.7 Code is open weight, while GPT-4o mini is proprietary.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Kimi K2.7 Code and GPT-4o mini don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.