Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | 1T | 74B |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | 256k | — |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | $0.95 | — |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | $4.00 | — |
Cached input priceA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again. | $0.19 | — |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.6712Inceptron | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $3.00StreamLake | — |
| $293StreamLake | — | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
DeepSWE 1.1Agentic coding — Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. (Version 1.1 of the test.) Higher is better. | 31% | — |
Next.js EvalsNext.js coding — Vercel's open eval of how well AI coding agents build and migrate real Next.js apps — measured as the share of tasks the agent completes successfully. Higher is better. | 74% | — |
Terminal-Bench 2.1Agentic terminal coding — Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | — | 50.98% |
MCP AtlasMulti-step tool use — Can the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | — | 52.2% |
BrowseCompWeb browsing — Can the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | — | 66.75% |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 86.43% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Moonshot AI | NVIDIA |
| Release date | Jun 12 2026 | Oct 15 2026 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Kimi K2.7 CodevsClaude Haiku 5.5Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74BvsClaude Haiku 5.5Kimi K2.7 CodevsGPT-6.1 SolNemotron 3.5 Bolt 74BvsGPT-6.1 SolKimi K2.7 CodevsGemini 4 ArgonNemotron 3.5 Bolt 74BvsGemini 4 ArgonKimi K2.7 CodevsMuse Spark OpenNemotron 3.5 Bolt 74BvsMuse Spark OpenKimi K2.7 CodevsGrok 4.7Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74BvsGrok 4.7Kimi K2.7 CodevsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashNemotron 3.5 Bolt 74BvsDeepSeek-V4.1-FlashFrequently asked questions
Kimi K2.7 Code and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Only Kimi K2.7 Code has a verified first-party API price: $0.95 per million input tokens and $4.00 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B. Kimi K2.7 Code shipped 125 days before Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Kimi K2.7 Code has 1T parameters, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B has 74B.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Kimi K2.7 Code and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.