Mistral NeMovsQwen3.8-27B

Mistral NeMo
Qwen3.8-27B
Specifications
Parameters
12B
27B
Context window
128k
262k
Benchmarks
Agentic coding
SWE-Bench Pro
61.7%
Agentic coding
DeepSWE 1.1
42.2%
Repo-level code generation
NL2Repo-Bench
42.3%
Software engineering
QwenSWEBench
79%
Competitive coding
LiveCodeBench
90.3%
Agentic terminal coding
Terminal-Bench 2.1
73%
Professional tool use
JobBench
33.4%
Long-horizon office work
CoWorkBench
70.7%
Multidisciplinary reasoning
Humanity's Last Exam · no tools
30.8%
Science
GPQA Diamond
89.2%
Instruction following
IFBench
79.5%
Agentic computer use
Agent's Last Exam · pass@1
20.4%
Agentic computer use
Agent's Last Exam · score
42.9%
Overview
CompanyMistralQwen
Release dateJul 18 2024Aug 14 2026
AccessOpen WeightOpen Weight

Which is better: Mistral NeMo or Qwen3.8-27B?

Mistral NeMo and Qwen3.8-27B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Mistral NeMo shipped 757 days before Qwen3.8-27B, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.

Mistral NeMo has 12B parameters, while Qwen3.8-27B has 27B. Context windows are 128k (Mistral NeMo) vs 262k (Qwen3.8-27B).

Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Mistral NeMo and Qwen3.8-27B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.

Frequently asked questions

Mistral NeMo was released by Mistral on Jul 18 2024.

Qwen3.8-27B was released by Qwen on Aug 14 2026.

Mistral NeMo has a 128k context window; Qwen3.8-27B has 262k.

Other comparisons