AI Model Release Tracker

Compare AI models

Specifications
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality.
—9B
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider.
128k128k
API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page.
$0.40Mistral—
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input.
$2.00Mistral—
$180Mistral · zdr—
Overview
CompanyMistralZ.ai
Release dateMay 7 2025Jun 5 2024
AccessClosedOpen Weight
Model detailsView modelView model

Other comparisons

Mistral Medium 3vsClaude Haiku 5.5GLM-4-9BvsClaude Haiku 5.5Mistral Medium 3vsGPT-6.1 SolGLM-4-9BvsGPT-6.1 SolMistral Medium 3vsGemini 4 ArgonGLM-4-9BvsGemini 4 ArgonMistral Medium 3vsMuse Spark OpenGLM-4-9BvsMuse Spark OpenMistral Medium 3vsGrok 4.7GLM-4-9BvsGrok 4.7Mistral Medium 3vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017GLM-4-9BvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017

Frequently asked questions

Mistral Medium 3 and GLM-4-9B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. GLM-4-9B shipped 336 days before Mistral Medium 3, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.

Context windows are 128k (Mistral Medium 3) vs 128k (GLM-4-9B). Mistral Medium 3 is closed, while GLM-4-9B is open weight.

Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Mistral Medium 3 and GLM-4-9B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.