Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | 123B | — |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 128k | 400k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $2.00Mistral | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $6.00Mistral | — |
| $700Mistral | — | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | — | 45% |
Next.js EvalsNext.js coding — Vercel's open eval of how well AI coding agents build and migrate real Next.js apps — measured as the share of tasks the agent completes successfully. Higher is better. | — | 46% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Mistral | OpenAI |
| Release date | Jul 24 2024 | Dec 18 2025 |
| Access | Open Weight | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Mistral Large 2vsClaude Fable 5.2GPT-5.2-CodexvsClaude Fable 5.2Mistral Large 2vsGemini 4 CarbonGPT-5.2-CodexvsGemini 4 CarbonMistral Large 2vsMuse EmberGPT-5.2-CodexvsMuse EmberMistral Large 2vsGrok 4.7GPT-5.2-CodexvsGrok 4.7Mistral Large 2vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017GPT-5.2-CodexvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Mistral Large 2vsKimi K3.1 ProGPT-5.2-CodexvsKimi K3.1 ProFrequently asked questions
Mistral Large 2 and GPT-5.2-Codex don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Mistral Large 2 shipped 512 days before GPT-5.2-Codex, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 128k (Mistral Large 2) vs 400k (GPT-5.2-Codex). Mistral Large 2 is open weight, while GPT-5.2-Codex is closed.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Mistral Large 2 and GPT-5.2-Codex don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.