Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 40k | 400k |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | — | 45% |
Next.js EvalsNext.js coding — Vercel's open eval of how well AI coding agents build and migrate real Next.js apps — measured as the share of tasks the agent completes successfully. Higher is better. | — | 46% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Mistral | OpenAI |
| Release date | Jun 10 2025 | Dec 18 2025 |
| Access | Closed | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Magistral MediumvsClaude Fable 5.2GPT-5.2-CodexvsClaude Fable 5.2Magistral MediumvsGemini 4 CarbonGPT-5.2-CodexvsGemini 4 CarbonMagistral MediumvsMuse EmberGPT-5.2-CodexvsMuse EmberMagistral MediumvsGrok 4.7GPT-5.2-CodexvsGrok 4.7Magistral MediumvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017GPT-5.2-CodexvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Magistral MediumvsKimi K3.1 ProGPT-5.2-CodexvsKimi K3.1 ProFrequently asked questions
Magistral Medium and GPT-5.2-Codex don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Magistral Medium shipped 191 days before GPT-5.2-Codex, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 40k (Magistral Medium) vs 400k (GPT-5.2-Codex).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Magistral Medium and GPT-5.2-Codex don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.