Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | 24B | 80B |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 256k | 256k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | — | $0.072DeepInfra |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | — | $0.88DeepInfra |
| — | $73.00DeepInfra · fp8 | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 68% | — |
SWE-Bench MultilingualMultilingual coding — Like SWE-Bench, but the coding problems span many programming languages, not just one. Tests how broadly the AI can code. Higher is better. | 55.7% | — |
Terminal-Bench 2.0Agentic terminal coding — Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | 22.5% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Mistral | Qwen |
| Release date | Dec 9 2025 | Sep 11 2025 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Devstral Small 2 (24B)vsClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen3-NextvsClaude Haiku 5.5Devstral Small 2 (24B)vsGPT-6.1 SolQwen3-NextvsGPT-6.1 SolDevstral Small 2 (24B)vsGemini 4 ArgonQwen3-NextvsGemini 4 ArgonDevstral Small 2 (24B)vsMuse Spark OpenQwen3-NextvsMuse Spark OpenDevstral Small 2 (24B)vsGrok 4.7Qwen3-NextvsGrok 4.7Devstral Small 2 (24B)vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Qwen3-NextvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Frequently asked questions
Devstral Small 2 (24B) and Qwen3-Next don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Qwen3-Next shipped 89 days before Devstral Small 2 (24B), so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Devstral Small 2 (24B) has 24B parameters, while Qwen3-Next has 80B. Context windows are 256k (Devstral Small 2 (24B)) vs 256k (Qwen3-Next).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Devstral Small 2 (24B) and Qwen3-Next don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.