Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | 123B | — |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 256k | 128k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.40Mistral | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $2.00Mistral | — |
| $180Mistral | — | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 72.2% | — |
SWE-Bench MultilingualMultilingual coding — Like SWE-Bench, but the coding problems span many programming languages, not just one. Tests how broadly the AI can code. Higher is better. | 61.3% | — |
LiveCodeBenchCompetitive coding — Coding problems published so recently the AI can't have seen them in training — a contamination-free test of raw programming skill. Higher is better. | — | 74.8% |
Terminal-Bench 2.0Agentic terminal coding — Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | 32.6% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Mistral | SpaceXSI |
| Release date | Dec 9 2025 | Feb 17 2025 |
| Access | Open Weight | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Devstral 2 (123B)vsClaude Haiku 5.5Grok 3 minivsClaude Haiku 5.5Devstral 2 (123B)vsGPT-6.1 SolGrok 3 minivsGPT-6.1 SolDevstral 2 (123B)vsGemini 4 ArgonGrok 3 minivsGemini 4 ArgonDevstral 2 (123B)vsMuse Spark OpenGrok 3 minivsMuse Spark OpenDevstral 2 (123B)vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Grok 3 minivsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Devstral 2 (123B)vsKimi K3Grok 3 minivsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
Devstral 2 (123B) and Grok 3 mini don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Grok 3 mini shipped 295 days before Devstral 2 (123B), so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 256k (Devstral 2 (123B)) vs 128k (Grok 3 mini). Devstral 2 (123B) is open weight, while Grok 3 mini is closed.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Devstral 2 (123B) and Grok 3 mini don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.