Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | 816B | 7B |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 1M | 256k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $1.25BaseTen | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $4.25BaseTen | — |
| $463Modal | — | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
DeepSWE 1.1Agentic coding — Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. (Version 1.1 of the test.) Higher is better. | 60% | — |
Terminal-Bench 2.1Agentic terminal coding — Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 76.4% | — |
MCP AtlasMulti-step tool use — Can the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | 89.2% | — |
JobBenchProfessional tool use — Tests the AI on professional workplace tasks that require using real work tools — the kind of multi-step jobs an office worker handles. Higher is better. | 61.8% | — |
GDPval-AA v2Knowledge work — economically valuable knowledge work (v2, re-based Elo) | 1401 | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | Mistral |
| Release date | Oct 15 2026 | Jul 16 2024 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Muse Spark OpenvsClaude Haiku 5.5Codestral Mamba 7BvsClaude Haiku 5.5Muse Spark OpenvsGPT-6.1 SolCodestral Mamba 7BvsGPT-6.1 SolMuse Spark OpenvsGemini 4 ArgonCodestral Mamba 7BvsGemini 4 ArgonMuse Spark OpenvsGrok 4.7Codestral Mamba 7BvsGrok 4.7Muse Spark OpenvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Codestral Mamba 7BvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Muse Spark OpenvsKimi K3Codestral Mamba 7BvsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
Muse Spark Open and Codestral Mamba 7B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Codestral Mamba 7B shipped 821 days before Muse Spark Open, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Muse Spark Open has 816B parameters, while Codestral Mamba 7B has 7B. Context windows are 1M (Muse Spark Open) vs 256k (Codestral Mamba 7B).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Muse Spark Open and Codestral Mamba 7B don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.