Muse Spark 1.2vsGrok 4.20 Beta
Muse Spark 1.2 | Grok 4.20 Beta | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | 1M | — |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins · base tier | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | — | $1.25 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | — | $2.50 |
Cached input priceA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again. | — | $0.20 |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $1.25Meta | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $4.25Meta | — |
| Benchmarks | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 50% | 56% |
| BenchmarksPublished by one model only | ||
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | — | 76.7% |
DeepSWE 1.1Agentic coding — Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. (Version 1.1 of the test.) Higher is better. | 59.3% | — |
Terminal-Bench 2.1Agentic terminal coding — Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 82.9% | — |
ARC-AGI-2Abstract reasoning — Puzzle-style tests of abstract reasoning and pattern-finding — the kind of thing people find easy but AIs often struggle with. Higher is better. | — | 53.3% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | SpaceXAI |
| Release date | Aug 5 2026 | Feb 17 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Other comparisons
Muse Spark 1.2vsClaude Fable 5.1Grok 4.20 BetavsClaude Fable 5.1Muse Spark 1.2vsGPT-6 AstraGrok 4.20 BetavsGPT-6 AstraMuse Spark 1.2vsGemini 3.8 FlashGrok 4.20 BetavsGemini 3.8 FlashMuse Spark 1.2vsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Grok 4.20 BetavsDeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813Muse Spark 1.2vsMistral Medium 3.5Grok 4.20 BetavsMistral Medium 3.5Muse Spark 1.2vsKimi K3Grok 4.20 BetavsKimi K3
Frequently asked questions
Grok 4.20 Beta leads Muse Spark 1.2 on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (BullshitBench v2). Only Grok 4.20 Beta has a verified first-party API price: $1.25 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for Muse Spark 1.2. Grok 4.20 Beta shipped 169 days before Muse Spark 1.2, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
On BullshitBench v2, Grok 4.20 Beta leads at 56% vs Muse Spark 1.2 at 50%.