Muse Spark 1.2vsQwen2.5
Muse Spark 1.2 | Qwen2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | — | 72B |
Context window | 1M | 128k |
| Benchmarks | ||
Agentic coding DeepSWE 1.1Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. (Version 1.1 of the test.) Higher is better. | 59.3% | — |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 82.9% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | Qwen |
| Release date | Aug 5 2026 | Sep 19 2024 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
Which is better: Muse Spark 1.2 or Qwen2.5?
Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen2.5 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Qwen2.5 shipped 685 days before Muse Spark 1.2, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 1M (Muse Spark 1.2) vs 128k (Qwen2.5). Muse Spark 1.2 is proprietary, while Qwen2.5 is open weight.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Muse Spark 1.2 and Qwen2.5 don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.
Frequently asked questions
Muse Spark 1.2 was released by Meta on Aug 5 2026.
Qwen2.5 was released by Qwen on Sep 19 2024.
Muse Spark 1.2 has a 1M context window; Qwen2.5 has 128k.
Muse Spark 1.2 is a proprietary model released by Meta. Qwen2.5 is an open weight model released by Qwen.
Other comparisons
Muse Spark 1.2vsClaude Opus 5Qwen2.5vsClaude Opus 5Muse Spark 1.2vsGPT-5.6 SolQwen2.5vsGPT-5.6 SolMuse Spark 1.2vsGemini 3.6 FlashQwen2.5vsGemini 3.6 FlashMuse Spark 1.2vsGrok 4.5Qwen2.5vsGrok 4.5Muse Spark 1.2vsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Qwen2.5vsDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731Muse Spark 1.2vsMistral Medium 3.5Qwen2.5vsMistral Medium 3.5