Muse Spark 1.1 vs GLM-5.2
Meta Muse Spark 1.1 | Z.ai GLM-5.2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | Z.ai |
| Release date | Jul 9 2026 | Jun 16 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | — | 744B |
Context window | — | 1M |
| Benchmarks | ||
Nonsense detection BullshitBench v2Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | — | 31% |
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | 61.5% | 62.1%Best |
Agentic coding CursorBench v3.1Cursor's own test of harder, real-world coding tasks inside a code editor. Higher is better. | — | 54.6% |
Agentic coding DeepSWE 1.1Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. (Version 1.1 of the test.) Higher is better. | 53.3% | — |
Next.js coding Next.js EvalsVercel's open eval of how well AI coding agents build and migrate real Next.js apps — measured as the share of tasks the agent completes successfully. Higher is better. | — | 79% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 80% | 81%Best |
Multi-step tool use MCP AtlasCan the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | 88.1% | — |
Professional tool use JobBenchTests the AI on professional workplace tasks that require using real work tools — the kind of multi-step jobs an office worker handles. Higher is better. | 54.7% | — |
Personal tool use Toolathlon-VerifiedTests how well the AI uses everyday personal tools and apps to get things done — a human-checked version of Toolathlon. Higher is better. | 75.6% | — |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · no toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects, written so you can't just look up the answer. “No tools” means the AI answers on its own. Higher is better. | — | 40.5% |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | 62.1% | — |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 91.2% |
Agentic computer use OSWorld-VerifiedCan the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Higher is better. | 80.8% | — |
Agentic financial analysis Finance Agent v2Tests the AI on real financial-analysis work, like digging through reports and making sound decisions. Higher is better. | 57.2% | — |
Chart reasoning CharXiv ReasoningCan the AI read and reason about complex charts and figures, not just text? Higher is better. | 88.4% | — |
Visual reasoning BabyVisionTests core visual reasoning — seeing and understanding images the way even young children can, which AIs often find surprisingly hard. Higher is better. | 76.3% | — |
| Timeline | ||
| Release gap | GLM-5.2 shipped 23 days before Muse Spark 1.1 | |
Which is better: Muse Spark 1.1 or GLM-5.2?
GLM-5.2 leads Muse Spark 1.1 on 2 of the 2 benchmarks they both report (SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench 2.1). GLM-5.2 shipped 23 days before Muse Spark 1.1, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Muse Spark 1.1 is proprietary, while GLM-5.2 is open weight.
On SWE-Bench Pro, GLM-5.2 leads at 62.1% vs Muse Spark 1.1 at 61.5%. On Terminal-Bench 2.1, GLM-5.2 leads at 81% vs Muse Spark 1.1 at 80%.
Frequently asked questions
Muse Spark 1.1 was released by Meta on Jul 9 2026.
GLM-5.2 was released by Z.ai on Jun 16 2026.
GLM-5.2 leads on SWE-Bench Pro — Muse Spark 1.1 61.5% vs GLM-5.2 62.1%.
Muse Spark 1.1 is a proprietary model released by Meta. GLM-5.2 is an open weight model released by Z.ai.
Other comparisons
Muse Spark 1.1 vs Claude Sonnet 5GLM-5.2 vs Claude Sonnet 5Muse Spark 1.1 vs GPT-5.6 SolGLM-5.2 vs GPT-5.6 SolMuse Spark 1.1 vs Gemini OmniGLM-5.2 vs Gemini OmniMuse Spark 1.1 vs Grok 4.5GLM-5.2 vs Grok 4.5Muse Spark 1.1 vs DeepSeek-V4-ProGLM-5.2 vs DeepSeek-V4-ProMuse Spark 1.1 vs Mistral Medium 3.5GLM-5.2 vs Mistral Medium 3.5