Muse GlimmervsQwen3.7-Max
Muse Glimmer | Qwen3.7-Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | 30B | — |
| Benchmarks | ||
Nonsense detection BullshitBench v2Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | — | 71% |
Agentic coding SWE-Bench ProCan the AI fix real bugs in real software? It's handed actual problems from open-source projects and has to write code that genuinely solves them. Higher is better. | 51.2% | 60.6%Best |
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 76% | — |
Competitive coding LiveCodeBenchCoding problems published so recently the AI can't have seen them in training — a contamination-free test of raw programming skill. Higher is better. | — | 91.6% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 51.7% | — |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.0Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 69.7% |
Multi-step tool use MCP AtlasCan the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | 75.5% | 76.4%Best |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · no toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects, written so you can't just look up the answer. “No tools” means the AI answers on its own. Higher is better. | 22% | — |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 83.5% | 92.4%Best |
Agentic computer use OSWorld-VerifiedCan the AI actually operate a computer — clicking, typing, and using real apps — to finish tasks on its own? Higher is better. | 65.9% | — |
Knowledge work GDPval-AA v2economically valuable knowledge work (v2, re-based Elo) | 953 | — |
Chart reasoning CharXiv ReasoningCan the AI read and reason about complex charts and figures, not just text? Higher is better. | 78.8% | — |
Multimodal reasoning MMMU-ProA tougher version of MMMU — college-level questions that mix images, diagrams, and text together. Higher is better. | 74% | — |
Community preference Arena Elo (Text)Real people chat with two anonymous AIs side by side and vote for the answer they prefer. Votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai — it measures which AI people actually like, not test scores. Higher is better. | — | 1475 |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | Qwen |
| Release date | Aug 10 2026 | May 20 2026 |
| Access | Open Weight | Proprietary |
Which is better: Muse Glimmer or Qwen3.7-Max?
Qwen3.7-Max leads Muse Glimmer on 3 of the 3 benchmarks they both report (SWE-Bench Pro, MCP Atlas, GPQA Diamond). Qwen3.7-Max shipped 82 days before Muse Glimmer, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Muse Glimmer is open weight, while Qwen3.7-Max is proprietary.
On SWE-Bench Pro, Qwen3.7-Max leads at 60.6% vs Muse Glimmer at 51.2%. On MCP Atlas, Qwen3.7-Max leads at 76.4% vs Muse Glimmer at 75.5%. On GPQA Diamond, Qwen3.7-Max leads at 92.4% vs Muse Glimmer at 83.5%.
Frequently asked questions
Muse Glimmer was released by Meta on Aug 10 2026.
Qwen3.7-Max was released by Qwen on May 20 2026.
Qwen3.7-Max leads on SWE-Bench Pro — Muse Glimmer 51.2% vs Qwen3.7-Max 60.6%.
Qwen3.7-Max leads on GPQA Diamond — Muse Glimmer 83.5% vs Qwen3.7-Max 92.4%.
Muse Glimmer is an open weight model released by Meta. Qwen3.7-Max is a proprietary model released by Qwen.