Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | 109B | — |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 10M | 400k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | — | $12.50 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | — | $75.00 |
Cached input priceA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again. | — | $1.25 |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.08DeepInfra | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $0.24DeepInfra | — |
| $35.00DeepInfra · fp8 | $6,250OpenAI list price | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 20% | — |
LiveCodeBenchCompetitive coding — Coding problems published so recently the AI can't have seen them in training — a contamination-free test of raw programming skill. Higher is better. | 32.8% | — |
Advanced Cybersecurity Completion Rate (Internal)Agentic tasks — share of advanced cyber requests the model responds to; measures willingness to answer, not exploit success | — | 95% |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 57.2% | — |
MMLU-ProKnowledge — accuracy on the ten-option MMLU-Pro benchmark | 74.3% | — |
MGSMMultilingual math — solving grade-school word problems translated into multiple languages | 90.6% | — |
MathVistaMultimodal reasoning — mathematical reasoning about visual information | 70.7% | — |
MMMU-Pro · standard and vision meanMultimodal reasoning — average across the standard and vision sets | 52.2% | — |
MMMUMultimodal — Tests the AI on understanding images and text together across many college subjects. Higher is better. | 69.4% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | OpenAI |
| Release date | Apr 5 2025 | Aug 10 2026 |
| Access | Open Weight | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
LLaMA 4 ScoutvsClaude Fable 5.2GPT-5.6 CybervsClaude Fable 5.2LLaMA 4 ScoutvsGemini 4 CarbonGPT-5.6 CybervsGemini 4 CarbonLLaMA 4 ScoutvsGrok 4.7GPT-5.6 CybervsGrok 4.7LLaMA 4 ScoutvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017GPT-5.6 CybervsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017LLaMA 4 ScoutvsMistral Large 4GPT-5.6 CybervsMistral Large 4LLaMA 4 ScoutvsKimi K3.1 ProGPT-5.6 CybervsKimi K3.1 ProFrequently asked questions
LLaMA 4 Scout and GPT-5.6 Cyber don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Only GPT-5.6 Cyber has a verified first-party price for an available API: $12.50 per million input tokens and $75.00 per million output tokens. No currently available pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for LLaMA 4 Scout. LLaMA 4 Scout shipped 492 days before GPT-5.6 Cyber, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 10M (LLaMA 4 Scout) vs 400k (GPT-5.6 Cyber). LLaMA 4 Scout is open weight, while GPT-5.6 Cyber is closed.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — LLaMA 4 Scout and GPT-5.6 Cyber don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.