Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | 8B/70B/405B | — |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 128k | 400k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.02DeepInfra | — |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $0.04DeepInfra | — |
| $6.00DeepInfra · fp8 | — | |
| Benchmarks | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 14% | 45% |
Next.js EvalsNext.js coding — Vercel's open eval of how well AI coding agents build and migrate real Next.js apps — measured as the share of tasks the agent completes successfully. Higher is better. | — | 46% |
HumanEvalFunction synthesis — 164 small Python problems: the AI is given a function's description and has to write the working function. This was the coding benchmark of the GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 era, before the field moved to fixing real bugs in real repositories. Higher is better. | 89% | — |
MATHReasoning — accuracy on the original competition mathematics test set | 73.8% | — |
ARC-ChallengeReasoning — multiple-choice science questions from the AI2 Reasoning Challenge; unrelated to ARC-AGI | 96.9% | — |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 49% | — |
MMLU-ProKnowledge — accuracy on the ten-option MMLU-Pro benchmark | 73.3% | — |
MMLUGeneral knowledge — A 57-subject multiple-choice exam — history, law, medicine, maths — that was the standard measure of how much a model knows from 2020 until roughly 2024, when frontier scores crowded into the high 80s and labs moved on to harder tests. The scores here were published years apart under different testing setups, so read them as a historical record rather than a like-for-like ranking. Higher is better. | 87.3% | — |
MGSMMultilingual math — solving grade-school word problems translated into multiple languages | 91.6% | — |
GSM8KGrade-school math — Grade-school maths word problems that take a few steps of arithmetic to work through. It separated the models of 2022 and 2023 sharply, then saturated. One caveat on the historical numbers: OpenAI included part of the GSM8K training set in GPT-4's pre-training mix, so GPT-4's score is not a clean few-shot result. Higher is better. | 96.8% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | Meta | OpenAI |
| Release date | Jul 23 2024 | Dec 18 2025 |
| Access | Open Weight | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
LLaMA 3.1vsClaude Fable 5.2GPT-5.2-CodexvsClaude Fable 5.2LLaMA 3.1vsGemini 4 CarbonGPT-5.2-CodexvsGemini 4 CarbonLLaMA 3.1vsGrok 4.7GPT-5.2-CodexvsGrok 4.7LLaMA 3.1vsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017GPT-5.2-CodexvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017LLaMA 3.1vsMistral Large 4GPT-5.2-CodexvsMistral Large 4LLaMA 3.1vsKimi K3.1 ProGPT-5.2-CodexvsKimi K3.1 ProFrequently asked questions
GPT-5.2-Codex leads LLaMA 3.1 on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (BullshitBench v2). LLaMA 3.1 shipped 513 days before GPT-5.2-Codex, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 128k (LLaMA 3.1) vs 400k (GPT-5.2-Codex). LLaMA 3.1 is open weight, while GPT-5.2-Codex is closed.
On BullshitBench v2, GPT-5.2-Codex leads at 45% vs LLaMA 3.1 at 14%.