Compare AI models

Specifications
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality.
1B/4B/12B/27B—
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider.
128k200k
API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it.
—$1.10
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one.
—$4.40
Cached input priceA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again.
—$0.55
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page.
$0.04DeepInfra$1.10OpenAI
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input.
$0.05Parasail$4.40OpenAI
$10.50Parasail · bf16$440OpenAI list price
These models have no shared benchmark scores.
Overview
CompanyGoogleOpenAI
Release dateMar 12 2025Jan 31 2025
AccessOpen WeightClosed
Model detailsView modelView model

Frequently asked questions

Gemma 3 and o3-mini don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Only o3-mini has a verified first-party API price: $1.10 per million input tokens and $4.40 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for Gemma 3. o3-mini shipped 40 days before Gemma 3, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.

Context windows are 128k (Gemma 3) vs 200k (o3-mini). Gemma 3 is open weight, while o3-mini is closed.

Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Gemma 3 and o3-mini don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.