Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 1M | 128k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | $0.25 | $10.00 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | $1.50 | $30.00 |
Cached input priceA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again. | $0.025 | — |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.125Google AI Studio | $10.00OpenAI |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $0.75Google AI Studio | $30.00OpenAI |
| $125Google list price | $3,500OpenAI list price | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 11% | — |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 42.5% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | OpenAI | |
| Release date | Mar 3 2026 | Nov 6 2023 |
| Access | Closed | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Gemini 3.1 Flash-LitevsClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-4 TurbovsClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 3.1 Flash-LitevsMuse Spark OpenGPT-4 TurbovsMuse Spark OpenGemini 3.1 Flash-LitevsGrok 4.7GPT-4 TurbovsGrok 4.7Gemini 3.1 Flash-LitevsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017GPT-4 TurbovsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Gemini 3.1 Flash-LitevsMistral Large 4GPT-4 TurbovsMistral Large 4Gemini 3.1 Flash-LitevsKimi K3GPT-4 TurbovsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and GPT-4 Turbo don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite is cheaper on both input and output: $0.25 vs $10.00 per million input tokens, and $1.50 vs $30.00 per million output tokens. GPT-4 Turbo shipped 848 days before Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 1M (Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite) vs 128k (GPT-4 Turbo).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite and GPT-4 Turbo don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.