Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 1M | 128k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | $0.10 | $10.00 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | $0.40 | $30.00 |
Cached input priceA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again. | $0.01 | — |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.05Google AI Studio | $10.00OpenAI |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $0.20Google AI Studio | $30.00OpenAI |
| $40.00Google list price | $3,500OpenAI list price | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 42.5% |
| Overview | ||
| Company | OpenAI | |
| Release date | Jun 17 2025 | Nov 6 2023 |
| Access | Closed | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Gemini 2.5 Flash-LitevsClaude Haiku 5.5GPT-4 TurbovsClaude Haiku 5.5Gemini 2.5 Flash-LitevsMuse Spark OpenGPT-4 TurbovsMuse Spark OpenGemini 2.5 Flash-LitevsGrok 4.7GPT-4 TurbovsGrok 4.7Gemini 2.5 Flash-LitevsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017GPT-4 TurbovsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Gemini 2.5 Flash-LitevsMistral Large 4GPT-4 TurbovsMistral Large 4Gemini 2.5 Flash-LitevsKimi K3GPT-4 TurbovsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and GPT-4 Turbo don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is cheaper on both input and output: $0.10 vs $10.00 per million input tokens, and $0.40 vs $30.00 per million output tokens. GPT-4 Turbo shipped 589 days before Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 1M (Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite) vs 128k (GPT-4 Turbo).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite and GPT-4 Turbo don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.