Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 1M | 200k |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
SWE-Bench VerifiedCoding — Real coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | 12.5% | — |
LiveCodeBenchCompetitive coding — Coding problems published so recently the AI can't have seen them in training — a contamination-free test of raw programming skill. Higher is better. | 28.9% | — |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 51.5% | — |
SimpleQAKnowledge — accuracy on short, fact-seeking questions in the original SimpleQA set | 21.7% | — |
MMLU-ProKnowledge — accuracy on the ten-option MMLU-Pro benchmark | 71.6% | — |
MMMUMultimodal — Tests the AI on understanding images and text together across many college subjects. Higher is better. | 68% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | OpenAI | |
| Release date | Feb 5 2025 | May 16 2025 |
| Access | Closed | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
Gemini 2.0 Flash-LitevsClaude Fable 5.2codex-mini-latestvsClaude Fable 5.2Gemini 2.0 Flash-LitevsMuse Embercodex-mini-latestvsMuse EmberGemini 2.0 Flash-LitevsGrok 4.7codex-mini-latestvsGrok 4.7Gemini 2.0 Flash-LitevsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017codex-mini-latestvsDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017Gemini 2.0 Flash-LitevsMistral Large 4codex-mini-latestvsMistral Large 4Gemini 2.0 Flash-LitevsKimi K3.1 Procodex-mini-latestvsKimi K3.1 ProFrequently asked questions
Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and codex-mini-latest don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite shipped 100 days before codex-mini-latest, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Context windows are 1M (Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite) vs 200k (codex-mini-latest).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite and codex-mini-latest don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.