DeepSeek-V4-ProvsGPT-4o mini
DeepSeek-V4-Pro | GPT-4o mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | — | 128k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Input priceWhat you pay for everything you send the model — your question, plus any documents or earlier conversation you include with it. | — | $0.15 |
Output priceWhat you pay for the text the model writes back. It is normally the dearer half: producing an answer costs more than reading one. | — | $0.60 |
Cached input priceA reduced rate for text you send over and over. If every request starts with the same instructions or the same document, the provider keeps a copy ready and charges less to read it again. | — | $0.075 |
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | $0.7078StreamLake | $0.15Azure |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across third-party providers, excluding the lab itself. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | $1.4157StreamLake | $0.60Azure |
| Benchmarks | ||
BullshitBench v2Nonsense detection — Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 14% | 2% |
GPQA DiamondScience — Graduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | 90.1% | 40.2% |
| BenchmarksPublished by one model only | ||
LiveCodeBenchCompetitive coding — Coding problems published so recently the AI can't have seen them in training — a contamination-free test of raw programming skill. Higher is better. | 93.5% | — |
BrowseCompWeb browsing — Can the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | 83.4% | — |
| Overview | ||
| Company | DeepSeek | OpenAI |
| Release date | Apr 24 2026 | Jul 18 2024 |
| Access | Open Weight | Proprietary |
Other comparisons
DeepSeek-V4-ProvsClaude Fable 5.1GPT-4o minivsClaude Fable 5.1DeepSeek-V4-ProvsGemini 3.8 FlashGPT-4o minivsGemini 3.8 FlashDeepSeek-V4-ProvsMuse Spark 1.3GPT-4o minivsMuse Spark 1.3DeepSeek-V4-ProvsGrok 4.6GPT-4o minivsGrok 4.6DeepSeek-V4-ProvsMistral Medium 3.5GPT-4o minivsMistral Medium 3.5DeepSeek-V4-ProvsKimi K3GPT-4o minivsKimi K3
Frequently asked questions
DeepSeek-V4-Pro leads GPT-4o mini on 2 of the 2 benchmarks they both report (BullshitBench v2, GPQA Diamond). Only GPT-4o mini has a verified first-party API price: $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.60 per million output tokens. No pay-as-you-go API rate is tracked for DeepSeek-V4-Pro. GPT-4o mini shipped 645 days before DeepSeek-V4-Pro, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro is open weight, while GPT-4o mini is proprietary.
On BullshitBench v2, DeepSeek-V4-Pro leads at 14% vs GPT-4o mini at 2%. On GPQA Diamond, DeepSeek-V4-Pro leads at 90.1% vs GPT-4o mini at 40.2%.