DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813vsGLM-4.7
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 | GLM-4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Context window | — | 128k |
| Benchmarks | ||
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | — | 73.8% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 87.9% | — |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.0Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? (Version 2.0 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 41% |
Personal tool use Toolathlon-VerifiedTests how well the AI uses everyday personal tools and apps to get things done — a human-checked version of Toolathlon. Higher is better. | 74.1% | — |
Web browsing BrowseCompCan the AI browse the web and track down hard-to-find answers? Higher is better. | — | 52% |
Cybersecurity CyberGymTests the AI on cybersecurity challenges — finding and exploiting software weaknesses inside a safe sandbox. Higher is better. | 83.3% | — |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · no toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects, written so you can't just look up the answer. “No tools” means the AI answers on its own. Higher is better. | 42.7%Best | 24.8% |
Multidisciplinary reasoning Humanity's Last Exam · with toolsHumanity's Last Exam — extremely hard expert questions across many subjects. “With tools” means the AI is allowed to search the web or run code while answering. Higher is better. | 60%Best | 42.8% |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 85.7% |
Business workflows AutomationBenchTests whether the AI can run real multi-step business workflows — the kind of end-to-end office processes companies want to automate — from start to finish. Higher is better. | 31.8% | — |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | — | 1433 |
| Overview | ||
| Company | DeepSeek | Z.ai |
| Release date | Aug 13 2026 | Dec 22 2025 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
Which is better: DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or GLM-4.7?
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 leads GLM-4.7 on 2 of the 2 benchmarks they both report (Humanity's Last Exam). GLM-4.7 shipped 234 days before DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is proprietary, while GLM-4.7 is open weight.
On Humanity's Last Exam · no tools, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 leads at 42.7% vs GLM-4.7 at 24.8%. On Humanity's Last Exam · with tools, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 leads at 60% vs GLM-4.7 at 42.8%.
Frequently asked questions
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 was released by DeepSeek on Aug 13 2026.
GLM-4.7 was released by Z.ai on Dec 22 2025.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 leads on Humanity's Last Exam · no tools — DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 42.7% vs GLM-4.7 24.8%.
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is a proprietary model released by DeepSeek. GLM-4.7 is an open weight model released by Z.ai.