DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsKimi K2.5
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 | Kimi K2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Specifications | ||
Parameters | — | 1T |
Context window | — | 256k |
| Benchmarks | ||
Nonsense detection BullshitBench v2Given a confidently-worded but nonsensical prompt, does the AI spot that it makes no sense and push back — instead of playing along and inventing an answer? The score is how often it clearly called out the nonsense. Higher is better. | 38% | 52%Best |
Coding SWE-Bench VerifiedReal coding tasks pulled from open-source projects — the AI has to find and fix actual bugs. A human-checked version of the original SWE-Bench. Higher is better. | — | 76.8% |
Agentic coding CursorBench v3.1Cursor's own test of harder, real-world coding tasks inside a code editor. Higher is better. | — | 31.9% |
Next.js coding Next.js EvalsVercel's open eval of how well AI coding agents build and migrate real Next.js apps — measured as the share of tasks the agent completes successfully. Higher is better. | — | 21% |
Competitive coding LiveCodeBenchCoding problems published so recently the AI can't have seen them in training — a contamination-free test of raw programming skill. Higher is better. | — | 85% |
Agentic terminal coding Terminal-Bench 2.1Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | 82.7% | — |
Personal tool use Toolathlon-VerifiedTests how well the AI uses everyday personal tools and apps to get things done — a human-checked version of Toolathlon. Higher is better. | 70.3% | — |
Cybersecurity CyberGymTests the AI on cybersecurity challenges — finding and exploiting software weaknesses inside a safe sandbox. Higher is better. | 76.7% | — |
Science GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions in biology, physics, and chemistry — hard enough that subject-matter PhDs score around 65%. Higher is better. | — | 87.6% |
Business workflows AutomationBenchTests whether the AI can run real multi-step business workflows — the kind of end-to-end office processes companies want to automate — from start to finish. Higher is better. | 25.1% | — |
Community preference (code) Arena Elo (Code)Like the text arena, but people vote on which AI writes better code. The votes become a chess-style Elo rating on arena.ai. Higher is better. | — | 1433 |
| Overview | ||
| Company | DeepSeek | Moonshot AI |
| Release date | Jul 31 2026 | Jan 27 2026 |
| Access | Proprietary | Open Weight |
Which is better: DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 or Kimi K2.5?
Kimi K2.5 leads DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 on 1 of the 1 benchmark they both report (BullshitBench v2). Kimi K2.5 shipped 185 days before DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 is proprietary, while Kimi K2.5 is open weight.
On BullshitBench v2, Kimi K2.5 leads at 52% vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 at 38%.
Frequently asked questions
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 was released by DeepSeek on Jul 31 2026.
Kimi K2.5 was released by Moonshot AI on Jan 27 2026.
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 is a proprietary model released by DeepSeek. Kimi K2.5 is an open weight model released by Moonshot AI.
Other comparisons
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsClaude Opus 5Kimi K2.5vsClaude Opus 5DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsGPT-5.6 SolKimi K2.5vsGPT-5.6 SolDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsGemini 3.6 FlashKimi K2.5vsGemini 3.6 FlashDeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsMuse Spark 1.1Kimi K2.5vsMuse Spark 1.1DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsGrok 4.5Kimi K2.5vsGrok 4.5DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731vsMistral Medium 3.5Kimi K2.5vsMistral Medium 3.5