Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | 236B | 0.5B/1.5B/3B/7B/14B/32B |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 128k | 128k |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | — | $0.66Cloudflare |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | — | $1.00Cloudflare |
| — | $182Cloudflare | |
| Overview | ||
| Company | DeepSeek | Qwen |
| Release date | Dec 10 2024 | Nov 12 2024 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
DeepSeek V2.5 (Revised)vsClaude Haiku 5.5Qwen2.5-CodervsClaude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek V2.5 (Revised)vsGPT-6.1 SolQwen2.5-CodervsGPT-6.1 SolDeepSeek V2.5 (Revised)vsGemini 4 ArgonQwen2.5-CodervsGemini 4 ArgonDeepSeek V2.5 (Revised)vsMuse Spark OpenQwen2.5-CodervsMuse Spark OpenDeepSeek V2.5 (Revised)vsGrok 4.7Qwen2.5-CodervsGrok 4.7DeepSeek V2.5 (Revised)vsMistral Large 4Qwen2.5-CodervsMistral Large 4Frequently asked questions
DeepSeek V2.5 (Revised) and Qwen2.5-Coder don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. Qwen2.5-Coder shipped 28 days before DeepSeek V2.5 (Revised), so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
DeepSeek V2.5 (Revised) has 236B parameters, while Qwen2.5-Coder has 0.5B/1.5B/3B/7B/14B/32B. Context windows are 128k (DeepSeek V2.5 (Revised)) vs 128k (Qwen2.5-Coder).
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — DeepSeek V2.5 (Revised) and Qwen2.5-Coder don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.