Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersA rough measure of how big the model is. More parameters usually means more capable and more expensive to run, though it is a poor guide on its own — a smaller, newer model often beats a larger, older one. | — | 816B |
Context windowHow much text the model can hold in mind at once — your question, any documents you attach, the conversation so far, and its own reply. Go past it and the earliest part falls out of view. | — | 1M |
| API pricingUSD per 1M tokens · lower wins | ||
Cheapest inputLowest input rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. The cheapest endpoint may run a quantised build or a shorter context — see "Available from" on the model page. | — | $1.25BaseTen |
Cheapest outputLowest output rate across every provider on OpenRouter, the lab included. May come from a different provider than the cheapest input. | — | $4.25BaseTen |
| — | $463Modal | |
| These models have no shared benchmark scores. | ||
DeepSWE 1.1Agentic coding — Artificial Analysis' independent test of deep, agentic software-engineering work — the AI has to plan and carry out substantial coding tasks end to end. (Version 1.1 of the test.) Higher is better. | — | 60% |
Terminal-Bench 2.1Agentic terminal coding — Can the AI work in a command-line terminal — running commands and finishing technical setup tasks the way a developer would? Higher is better. | — | 76.4% |
MCP AtlasMulti-step tool use — Can the AI chain together many tools and steps to complete one bigger task, rather than doing just a single thing? Higher is better. | — | 89.2% |
JobBenchProfessional tool use — Tests the AI on professional workplace tasks that require using real work tools — the kind of multi-step jobs an office worker handles. Higher is better. | — | 61.8% |
GDPval-AA v2Knowledge work — economically valuable knowledge work (v2, re-based Elo) | — | 1401 |
| Overview | ||
| Company | DeepSeek | Meta |
| Release date | Dec 10 2024 | Oct 15 2026 |
| Access | Open Weight | Open Weight |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
DeepSeek V2.5 (Revised)vsClaude Haiku 5.5Muse Spark OpenvsClaude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek V2.5 (Revised)vsGPT-6.1 SolMuse Spark OpenvsGPT-6.1 SolDeepSeek V2.5 (Revised)vsGemini 4 ArgonMuse Spark OpenvsGemini 4 ArgonDeepSeek V2.5 (Revised)vsGrok 4.7Muse Spark OpenvsGrok 4.7DeepSeek V2.5 (Revised)vsMistral Large 4Muse Spark OpenvsMistral Large 4DeepSeek V2.5 (Revised)vsKimi K3Muse Spark OpenvsKimi K3Frequently asked questions
DeepSeek V2.5 (Revised) and Muse Spark Open don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. DeepSeek V2.5 (Revised) shipped 674 days before Muse Spark Open, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
Published specifications for these two models are limited — see each model page for the latest details.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — DeepSeek V2.5 (Revised) and Muse Spark Open don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.