Compare AI models
| Specifications | ||
ParametersThe learned values that shape how a model responds. B means billion and T means trillion. For mixture-of-experts models, the total count is larger than the number active for each token. Parameter count alone does not measure quality. | 1.3B/5.7B/6.7B/33B | 2.8T |
Context windowHow much information the model can work with in one request, measured in tokens — pieces of words or other data. This includes your question, attachments, conversation and reply. Limits can vary by model variant and provider. | 16k | 1M |
| Overview | ||
| Company | DeepSeek | Moonshot AI |
| Release date | Nov 2 2023 | Oct 23 2026 |
| Access | Open Weight | Closed |
| Model details | View model | View model |
Other comparisons
DeepSeek CodervsClaude Haiku 5.5Kimi K3.1 Pro HighspeedvsClaude Haiku 5.5DeepSeek CodervsGPT-6.1 SolKimi K3.1 Pro HighspeedvsGPT-6.1 SolDeepSeek CodervsGemini 4 ArgonKimi K3.1 Pro HighspeedvsGemini 4 ArgonDeepSeek CodervsMuse Spark OpenKimi K3.1 Pro HighspeedvsMuse Spark OpenDeepSeek CodervsGrok 4.7Kimi K3.1 Pro HighspeedvsGrok 4.7DeepSeek CodervsMistral Large 4Kimi K3.1 Pro HighspeedvsMistral Large 4Frequently asked questions
DeepSeek Coder and Kimi K3.1 Pro Highspeed don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks, so there's no direct head-to-head comparison. DeepSeek Coder shipped 1086 days before Kimi K3.1 Pro Highspeed, so benchmark comparisons should account for the intervening progress.
DeepSeek Coder has 1.3B/5.7B/6.7B/33B parameters, while Kimi K3.1 Pro Highspeed has 2.8T. Context windows are 16k (DeepSeek Coder) vs 1M (Kimi K3.1 Pro Highspeed). DeepSeek Coder is open weight, while Kimi K3.1 Pro Highspeed is closed.
Direct benchmark comparisons are unavailable — DeepSeek Coder and Kimi K3.1 Pro Highspeed don't publish scores on any of the same benchmarks.